It sounds sordid at worst and lazy at best, but in fact, the Fugates' tale is a miniature version of the story of human coupling since time immemorial. Local populations interbreed, causing a sharing of genes, a resulting in-group physical resemblance and, eventually, identification as a distinct race or ethnic group. According to Stephen Stearns, a Yale professor of ecology and evolutionary biology, before the invention of the bicycle, the average distance between the birthplaces of spouses in England was 1 mile 1.
During the latter half of the 19th century, bikes upped the distance men went courting to 30 miles 48 km , on average. Scholars have identified similar patterns in other European countries. Widespread use of bicycles stimulated the grading and paving of roads, lending credence to the Fugate clan's excuse and making way for the introduction of automobiles.
Love's horizons have kept expanding ever since. Stearns says globalization, immigration, cultural diffusion and the ease of modern travel will gradually homogenize the human population , averaging out more and more people's traits. Because recessive traits depend on two copies of the same gene pairing up in order to get expressed, these traits will express themselves more rarely, and dominant traits will become the norm.
In short, blue skin is out.
Brown skin is in. Already in the United States, another recessive trait, blue eyes, has grown far less common. A study by the epidemiologists Mark Grant and Diane Lauderdale found that only 1 in 6 non-Hispanic white Americans has blue eyes, down from more than half of the U.
Assortative mating is the tendency of people to mate with members of their same ancestral group — a tendency that has seemingly lessened over time. Lauderdale says blue eyes won't die out completely; they'll simply stabilize at a low level that reflects the chance of mating between two individuals possessing recessive blue-eye genes. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22 4 , —;. Crandall, C. Anti-fat prejudice. Nelson Ed. Diener, E.
- Human physical appearance!
- Accessibility links.
- Looking for other ways to read this?.
- free websites to find out if someone is married.
Physical attractiveness and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 1 , —;. Dion, K. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24 3 , — Donohoe, M. Behavioral Ecology, 20 4 , — Dubois, M. Psychological Reports, 95 3, Pt. Dunn, M. Universal sex differences in online advertisers age preferences: Comparing data from 14 cultures and 2 religious groups. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31 6 , —;. Dutton, D.
Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30 , — Eagly, A. What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 1 , — Epstein, J. Perceived physical attactiveness, sexual history, and sexual intentions: An internet study. Sex Roles, 56 1—2 , 23— Festinger, L.
Social pressures in informal groups. New York, NY: Harper.
- recorder of deeds greene county pennsylvania.
- Human physical appearance - Wikipedia.
- free myspace tracker with ip address.
- Ancient ape offers clues to evolution of two-legged walking.
Foster, C. Arousal and attraction: Evidence for automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 1 , 86— Freitas, A. The evaluative connotation of processing fluency: Inherently positive or moderated by motivational context? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41 6 , —;.
Gangestad, S. The evolutionary psychology of extra-pair sex: The role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18 2 , 69— Grammer, K. Female faces and bodies: N-dimensional feature space and attractiveness. Zebrowitz Eds.
Top 10 Things That Make Humans Special | Live Science
Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing. Griffin, A. Stereotype directionality and attractiveness stereotyping: Is beauty good or is ugly bad? Social Cognition, 24 2 , — Harmon-Jones, E. The role of affect in the mere exposure effect: Evidence from psychophysiological and individual differences approaches. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27 7 , — Harrison, A. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 , —;. Henderson, J. Facial attractiveness predicts longevity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24 5 , — Physical attractiveness of face and body as indicators of physical fitness in men.
Evolution and Human Behavior, 28 2 , —;. Hosoda, M. The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Personnel Psychology, 56 2 , — Isen, A. Effect of feeling good on helping: Cookies and kindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21 , — Jones, J.
How do I love thee? Let me count the Js: Implicit egotism and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87 5 , —;. Kalick, S.
Your choice of a life partner is no accident
The matching hypothesis reexamined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 4 , —;.
Kenrick, D. The Darwin is in the details.
IN ADDITION TO READING ONLINE, THIS TITLE IS AVAILABLE IN THESE FORMATS:
American Psychologist, 55 9 , — Kubitschek, W. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61 1 , 1— Langlois, J. Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive faces. Developmental Psychology, 27 , 79— Attractive faces are only average. What is average and what is not average about attractive faces? Psychological Science, 5 4 , — Lee, L. Psychological Science, 19 7 , — Li, N. The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82 6 , — Mita, T. Reversed facial images and the mere-exposure hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 8 , — Moreland, R. Exposure effects in the classroom: The development of affinity among students.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28 3 , — Nelson, L. Newcomb, T. The acquaintance process. Olson, I. Facial attractiveness is appraised in a glance. Emotion, 5 4 , —;.
Petersen, J. A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, — Psychological Bulletin, 1 , 21—38;. Pinel, E. Seeing I to I: A pathway to interpersonal connectedness.